AFT Forums

I'm not going to sit here and say that it's a brief read. I think the author knows that which is why he makes his own suggestions. It may not be digested or recommended to be read even in one sitting unless you have the time and attention span to do so. So to, there may be some things that you disagree with and some things that you feel are either missing or could be better brought forth. However, clearly a great deal of time was spent on this documenting and deconstructing the lies and inconsistencies surrounding this entire "pandemic." The mainstream narrative and the government/media/medical establishment narrative has been rife with contradictions and sketchy if not outright dishonest "facts" from the start. If more people realized that, cared, or didn't allow the spirit of fear, which does not come from God (2nd Timothy 1:7) than likely none of this, or much of this, would not have happened. Sadly, however, that is not the case. At this point I don't think the genie can be put back into the bottle. I would love to believe, in the flesh, that rather than the Great Reset instead a Great Awakening could occur and this attempt to run our lives, restrict our freedoms, steal what we have, and lie to us on a scale perhaps never before seen could all be defeated. Given the right circumstances and time, it likely could. However, while we have free will, we also don't control the events of this world. Our enemies don't control the events of this world. God controls the events of this world. As such, there comes a time in which He is going to allow Satan, his supernatural fallen angels currently held in chains in the book of Jude, and the seed which is the tares, who are of Cain and who are of Satan himself to have their day to deceive as much of the world as they can. Indeed, almost all of the world will be deceived and the reality is it is just starting. But starting nonetheless it is. There is a vision to establish, or at least try to. Daniel 11:14 And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall. Just a thought, but is there anyone "exalting themselves" more these days, or even being exalted and treated like heroes more than say Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, and the clown at the WEF Klaus Schawb? None of these men deserve it and no doubt every single one will be abased by God when the time is right. Now, I don't recommend running with that or making any crazy claims about any of them being the Antichrist or us already being in the Tribulation or one world system. None of them are, we are not, and we are not quite yet. But it is coming and all of those three in particular are working hard to make it happen. But they are not alone and they even are merely front men for those still behind the scenes. What is written must come to pass. But seeing what is coming to pass and recognizing it is one of the greatest blessings and "arming of oneself" that can happen today. Understand that there is no rapture and just as Noah was in those flood waters, just as Daniel was in the lion's den, and just as Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego went through their own "tribulation", so too was each protected by YHVH God so that no harm came to them whatsoever. Be aware of what was done. Be aware and on the lookout for what is about to transpire. Be wary too of con artists who claim to "know things" who instead make failed predictions and sow seeds of confusion. There isn't a man (or woman) out there who is going to get themselves anywhere or establish any credibility whatsoever by setting dates. That applies to "the end of the world" and that applies to claiming to know the day, week, or even month in which these clowns are going to pull their next trick. I also hold out hope, and yes faith, that based on past biblical examples and knowing God's love for His people and even all people that no matter what they have planned, He will only allow so much. Time and time again when those in Satan's camp and even those whom God used to punish and correct went just a bit too far, that was it and they were done. But we do watch, we do arm ourselves, and we try to help as many people out of confusion and deception as we can. Do your best to prepare financially and in terms of supplies and so forth. But more than that, do your best to prepare spiritually. Take the time, even in these chaotic days, and more so in these chaotic days, to keep your focus and your eyes on Him. Try to get into His Word if you're not. Try to reach out to Him for wisdom and protection if you have not. Feed yourselves with that manna from the Living Word. I happened to notice one of my friends on Facebook asked a simple question. "What happened when Peter took his eyes off Christ?" He began to sink. So too will we have a tendency to sink with everything that is thrown at us if we try to tread the water on our own. On our own, it can become too much the longer this goes. Why do I say that? Because again, the tribulation itself. If the days hadn't been shorted for the elect's sake, no flesh would be saved and even the elect would be deceived, as shown in Matthew 24. But with Christ, we won't sink. Everything that is happening was already written. Maybe not in detail, maybe even John and Daniel and whomever else, Ezekiel, didn't know or didn't understand everything the saw. But it has been written. So too has the ending to all of it. And remember one thing. The ending is, they lose. All of their plans, all of their gain, all their control, all of the wealth they place their hope in, gone in an instant at the 7th Trump. So you can follow that and you can trust in that. Or you can follow Christ and trust in Him. Pray that you, that I, that all of those with eyes and ears in these days never fail to do that. And the link is below. https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-2020-worldwide-corona-crisis-destroying-civil-society-engineered-economic-depression-global-coup-detat-and-the-great-reset/5730652

Okay, I don't want to go completely down conspiracy road here. Although, some of us well know there are conspiracy theories and then there are conspiracies. Much of the world is being held hostage to a very real conspiracy by a few elites and next to no one, percentage wise of the population, knows or understands this. I came across this and I'm not entirely sure what to make of it. Honestly, this person who represents himself or herself as a Christian, and may well be, hits on some things that are true and swings and misses on others in my opinion. For instance, they acknowledge a serpent seed and even understand how and where it originated. First of all, while that is another subject that many of you are well aware of, it deserves to be touched on at minimum here. Understand you will not find any mention of any apple tree or eating apples in the Word of God. Certainly not in the manuscripts or original King James bible. That is a fairy tale and Sunday school story that some false teachers apparently thought was cute. Trees are used in reference to people or even to God at several locations in the bible. God likens Himself to a green fir tree, everlasting in Hosea 14:8 Hosea 14:8 " Ephraim shall say, What have I to do any more with idols? I have heard [answered] him, and observed [will regard] him: I am like a green fir tree. From me is thy fruit found." Similarly, God likens his children to cedars of Lebanon and palm trees in Psalms 92:12. Btw, what where the people waving when Christ rode in on the ass? They were waving palm leaves. Psalms 92:12 "The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: He shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon." But Satan is represented as a tree as well, in Ezekiel 31 among other places. Ezekiel 31:8 "The cedars in the garden of God could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs, and the chestnut trees were not like his branches; nor any tree in the garden of God was like unto him in his beauty." Ezekiel 31:9 "I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: so that all the trees of Eden, that were in the garden of God, envied him." Understand of course that we can not be talking about literal trees here as trees do not think, feel, or envy. Nor was a man king, the Assyrian in verse 3 of this same chapter in the Garden of Eden as there was no nation of Assyria at least named nor was this individual king yet born in a flesh body at the time that Adam and Eve were in the Garden. But whom did God make perfect in beauty? Of course it was Lucifer/Satan himself. Ezekiel 28:12 "Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the King of Tyrus, and say unto him, 'Thus saith the Lord God; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty." Ezekiel 28:13 "Thou hast been in Eden the Garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the Sardis, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created." Again, was this fleshly King of Tyrus in the Garden of Eden? No, but again Satan was. It isn't hard to understand this and separate that out when you are blessed enough and sharp enough to read and divide the Word with understanding. So understand then that if Christ was and is the Tree of Life that will still be present in the eternity as we see in Revelation 22:2, the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, that same "tree" that possessed great beauty that was envied would be the opposite of that. If Christ and that Tree of Life offers spiritual and eternal life than the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil that would cause one to die according to God Himself would be Satan. Christ is life, Satan is death to put it hopefully simply enough. No need to get carried away with the labels. But at the same time, the labels work. The serpent was not some magic talking snake either. First of all, that again is fairy tale stuff. Second, while it is possible for God to open up the voice of a donkey, the serpent He created, the actual snake, has no vocal organs whatsoever. It can just make a hissing sound from its tongue striking out at the air around it. So that "old serpent" as again mentioned in Revelation 12:9 and 20:2 was a role and description for Satan. Nothing more. The tree, again a description of Satan, and nothing more. So then when Eve says that they were not to touch that tree in Genesis 3:3, what was she saying? It is sort of buried a bit in the Hebrew but it is there. It is Hebrew word 5060, naga. A primitive root; properly, to touch, i.e. Lay the hand upon (for any purpose; euphem., to lie with a woman ); by implication, to reach (figuratively, to arrive, acquire); violently, to strike (punish, defeat, destroy, etc.) -- beat, (X be able to) bring (down), cast, come (nigh), draw near (nigh), get up, happen, join, near, plague, reach (up), smite, strike, touch. Now, we know that no apple tree is mentioned. We know that no eating of apples are mentioned. What is mentioned after this encounter by God is the woman's (Eve's) conception and the woman's seed which shall crush the serpent's seed and the serpent's seed that shall bruise the heel of the woman's seed. Understand, today it's controversial. But before man decided to change it to apple trees, it was actually what was taught and known by the Hebrew children and Christians for hundreds and thousands of years. That same seed of the woman is the one who told certain ones that they were of their father the devil in the 8th chapter of John and taught the parable of the tares of the field sown by the wicked one as well. It's what Christ taught and it's whom He even again identified- the serpent seed. So, should we go by Christ's teachings or should we talk about apple trees because it's less embarrassing to the flesh? Now that is a huge digression from the main point of all of this but I think it's important to test fruits as much as one can as well as statements and teachings by matching them up to God's Word. This "stellar prophet" says Eve was raped. Which I don't get rape at all. Eve was actually the one who brought up the "naga" according to the Word. Eve was the one who saw that the tree was desirable as Satan was created perfect in beauty, and Eve consented to that act that took place. It seems of course that even Adam took part in some way as well. So, rape, no that didn't happen. And as far as "Jews" being the serpent seed, it would depend on whom you want to call a Jew and what they want to call themselves. Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9 both make this distinction and cover this point quite well. Better than any man can, including me. But that said, no man, no teacher, or one calling himself or herself a "prophet"- something to be at least somewhat wary of, is perfect. Not in the flesh by any means. That is just a reminder and a warning to not just go along with every bit of doctrine that comes along. Some who read this may not agree with what I have written here regarding trees and serpent seed. So be it. But go by the Word of God first. Now, this vaccine is without a doubt bad news. I don't know if it was a Freudian slip by Boris Johnson to say that the virus must be kept at -70 degrees. I could certainly see it being that and if a doctor or scientist says that is the temperature or in the range at which a virus would be stored to keep preserved, I would say at least some ears should perk up. I do know that even though it sounded like something from The Onion or Babylon Bee, both of which are satire btw, it was a real story that they are collecting volunteers in the UK to get vaccinated and then get infected supposedly with Covid-19. This is dangerously unethical and quite frankly I would think illegal, even on a "volunteer" basis. In this country we tried to deliberately infect or transmit Spanish flu to people about 100 years ago and now there are laws against such a thing. So how they would get away with this in the UK I don't know. But I do know that we're dealing with a rushed, experimental vaccine that people in the know are saying will alter our DNA, attach permanently to the genome, and lead to other effects that we don't know because we don't know. No vaccine like this has ever been made or offered or used before and while it is required to be tested on animals first, and think what you will of that, this has not been tested on animals. The lab rats and guinea pigs are not rats and guinea pigs, but are flesh and blood human beings. If you think that's wise and that it's perfectly safe to line up for your vaccine for a virus that has a greater than 99% survival rate, I would urge you to think again. Whether it's a virus in there or not, and it could well be, there are many, many, many better and safer options to protecting one's self than this particular jab. Again, research it, but not just what Moderna, Pfizer, hospital administrators, and politicians or media types want to say. Listen to and research what the people they don't want you to listen to have to say. It's your health, it's your life, and at least for now, it's still your decision. I certainly hope and pray that all of you make the right one and I can guarantee you it is not this vaccine. You can read the link below. https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2020/12/british-prime-minister-boris-johnson-lets-slip-that-the-cv19-vaccines-are-actually-a-virus-bolshevik-commies-in-the-white-house-too-blind-to-see-or-just-too-dumbed-down-to-notice-the-force-behind-2516882.html

I saw this article a few days ago and felt it was worth pointing out the absurdity of both what Gates had to say as well as Business Insider and their claim from the start. https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-rashida-jones-on-anti-maskers-are-like-nudists-2020-11 First, there is a distinct lack of credible evidence that wearing face masks curbs the transmission of coronavirus or any airborne respiratory virus. The author considers the evidence "overwhelming" because of two studies she cites. But while one of the studies could not even be totally scrolled through or read for me and while it's not my area of expertise, the one thing I have learned is that credible and scientifically accepted studies are not only double blind and peer reviewed but use randomized controlled trials in order to eliminate or at least reduce as much as possible any bias within the study and when coming to a conclusion about the results. I did not see any notation of randomized controlled trials used in either study. As a matter of fact, from what I could see on the Massachusetts hospital study, they seem to say two things that stand out. First, there could have been other factors that reduced Covid-19 positivity rates and that their study had limitations. They mentioned that even with the measures taken in the state of Massachusetts including mask wearing, rates of infection continued to rise even as they went down in the healthcare setting. Well of course comparing a healthcare setting in which people are highly trained to deal with mitigating infections is not an apples to apples comparison to the general population. Second, they seem to directly state that no randomized trials were conducted. I say seem to because again I could not get the study to come up quite right for me. There is a sentence that states " Randomized trials of universal masking of HCWs during a pandemic are likely not" and then the page cuts off or stops. My guess is that they're saying such trials are likely not possible or easy to do. But again randomized trials are the method for eliminating or reducing bias and when governments, media, businesses, and individuals like Bill Gates are screaming wear a mask and many of those people fund the scientific studies done, it might be nice to have some randomized trials as a part of them. As a matter of fact, speaking of studies, there was a Danish study done which was randomized and was extremely large in terms of a sample, studying 6,000 people. But no medical journal will publish the results of it. https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-won-t-anyone-publish-danish-mask-study Second, the timing of such a statement about the evidence being "overwhelming" is ludicrous on its face. Over 60% of the states in our country have mask mandates in place. In fact, it's closer to 75% as we now have 37 out of the 50 states with mask mandates in place. That is actually as of today. https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2020/states-mask-mandates-coronavirus.html Yet all we are hearing daily in the news is how numbers are surging and records are being broken, including in my mask mandated state of Ohio. So much for the rates sinking. I would be embarrassed to have written such a thing myself. So now let's move to some of the "genius" of Bill Gates from his podcast with Rashida Jones and take this point by point. "What are these, like, nudists?" he said. "I mean, you know, we ask you to wear pants, and no American says, or very few Americans say, that that's, like, some terrible thing." Well, gee, Bill. I guess you've got us there. For the most part people don't object to wearing pants. But that's because we agreed a long time ago that it's generally appropriate to do so. We didn't have a bunch of nudists running around or protesters marching somewhere in their underwear or with the bare bottoms glittering in the sun. The government didn't come along and say, "Starting Thursday evening at midnight you will begin wearing pants." We decided that and agreed to it on our own. Also, near as I can tell pants provide no health risks whatsoever. Yet we have, or had, medical exemptions that allow people to bypass wearing masks. Why would that be? Because they have a medical/respiratory condition that might lead to their life being in jeopardy if their natural breathing is impaired in any way. Given that it's dangerous for those people, it seems unlikely to be totally safe and healthy for the rest of us. And of course it indeed is not. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-risks-vs-benefits-of-face-masks-is-there-an-agenda/ The man who stayed at a Holiday Inn Express so he could pretend to be a health expert also said this. Gates said that early on, experts based their advice on what they knew about other respiratory viruses, like the common cold and the flu. Those illnesses might spread when people cough — but far less readily than COVID-19, which can jump between people who are merely talking. "These unbelievable viral loads that you see with coronavirus don't occur with most of the other respiratory viruses," Gates said. First of all, I would love to see credible evidence that Covid-19 is a virus that is spread merely by talking. Maybe they're working on or have developed a monster virus, perhaps the Covid-21 that some people claim will be released next year, that spreads like that. Until then, and short of that, all such a claim amounts to is extremist fear mongering. As it is, the Spanish flu was the most serious pandemic we've had in the last 100 years or so and when scientists tried to deliberately infect people with that virus they were unable to do so even when literally taking discharge from the nose and mouth and directly wiping it in the eyes, nose, and mouths of healthy people. https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/studies-question-transmission-1918-spanish-flu They literally were unable to prove that the Spanish flu was transmitted from person to person. Now the common wisdom is that bacterial infections killed more people than a mutated H1N1 flu virus did. History certainly always repeats itself and it would be interesting if we had another 100 years in this world- and we don't in this earth age- if people would find how wrong and mistaken we were about the nature of this "pandemic" as well. And as far as "viral load", the New York Times is not regarded as an objective bastion of truth telling by everyone these days. Yet in the summer they published an article stating a very legitimate point that Facebook recently claimed I was incorrect on. The cycle count for the Covid-19 PCR tests is set too high and as a result up to 90% of positive cases in New York, Massachusetts, and Nevada were individuals who had barely any active virus in them and were almost certainly not contagious. https://www.dailywire.com/news/ny-times-up-to-90-of-people-who-test-positive-for-covid-19-no-longer-contagious-dont-need-to-isolate Yet individuals like Bill Gates, "Do as you're told" Anthony Fauci, and almost every governor in the country wants to limit our freedoms and scare the heck out of us because faulty tests are causing surging case numbers. Keep in mind too that in the Children's Health Defense article I linked there is a point that there was almost universal face mask wearing in China leading up to the Covid-19 outbreak as they were wearing them for the flu season. Yet they still had the outbreak, face masks and all. Finally, the man with the bad haircut and the inability to protect our computers from viruses tells us this. COVID-19's ability to spread when people are asymptomatic is unusual too, he said. So while people with a cold or the flu tend to stay home when they're contagious because they don't feel well, people with COVID-19 can be walking around feeling healthy and unknowingly infecting those around them. Well, again the problem here is two fold. One, the piece from the New York Times again demonstrates that a large number, indeed a ridiculously large majority of Covid-19 positive individuals were likely never contagious. I'll almost guarantee that the people who have this who are contagious and if it is a virus that indeed passes from person to person, it is almost entirely the people who are sick and having symptoms, even if they're mild symptoms, that spread and transmit it. Not you and I who basically feel fine but might unwittingly kill someone who's vulnerable if we don't mask up. The second problem is that we know that the WHO, which ironically receives funding from and is heavily influenced by Bill Gates, said this past spring/summer as well that asymptomatic transmission of the virus is "very rare". Now, it got walked back once people got upset that they said that and it became this silliness of, "well really they're presymptomatic and they just haven't developed symptoms yet. Or really they're not asymptomatic they just didn't know they symptoms they had were Covid symptoms". https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattperez/2020/06/08/who-says-asymptomatic-spread-of-coronavirus-very-rare-but-experts-raise-questions/?sh=5eab4fb543d0 All of this of course is kind of akin to a lawyer trying to use word games to create doubt or Bill Clinton trying to explain how he did nothing wrong with Monica Lewinsky. They can say what they want but asymptomatic is not the same as presymptomatic or being "mildly ill or mildly diseased." This was a case in which the truth was accidentally told at the wrong time and they had to clean up the mess as best they could. But maybe if Bill and Rashida want to ask "big questions" on face masks, maybe they can ask this one. Why don't you wear a face mask Bill? Are you a nudist? And please don't tell me that we'll see you pantless next. No one wants that. https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-wont-bill-gates-wear-mask