From the article, I would not say they demonstrate proof without a doubt. But it would not surprise me in the least. I believe I did see the quote in the past from Arrange about not hurting Israel. How much sense does it make for an organization supposedly shining a light on government corruption not wanting to harm the government of a particular country? Yet there are people who believe deeply in Wikileaks the same way some believe in QAnon. If something seems suspicious it probably is. If some secret thing is supposed to take place and it doesn't, you are probably being played. To me Assange was always another garden variety narcissist and drama queen. Some act like he is this truth telling innocent victim. Almost assuredly he is not.
top of page
bottom of page
ohh.. now you are getting into my interest(s). I believe Assange started with good intentions, a narcissist, yes.. however, as time went on and he became a martyr, the overall intentions went out the window. Hence, why Russia could blackmail him, hence, why Israel came into play. The big fish. He had dirt on them and they had dirt on him... it was bound to end badly. And I would be careful using the M word outright, unlike Russia, they look at every single use of it, no matter where it comes from or in what context. Or so I have been told. 😜