Okay, I don't want to go completely down conspiracy road here. Although, some of us well know there are conspiracy theories and then there are conspiracies. Much of the world is being held hostage to a very real conspiracy by a few elites and next to no one, percentage wise of the population, knows or understands this.
I came across this and I'm not entirely sure what to make of it. Honestly, this person who represents himself or herself as a Christian, and may well be, hits on some things that are true and swings and misses on others in my opinion. For instance, they acknowledge a serpent seed and even understand how and where it originated.
First of all, while that is another subject that many of you are well aware of, it deserves to be touched on at minimum here.
Understand you will not find any mention of any apple tree or eating apples in the Word of God. Certainly not in the manuscripts or original King James bible. That is a fairy tale and Sunday school story that some false teachers apparently thought was cute. Trees are used in reference to people or even to God at several locations in the bible. God likens Himself to a green fir tree, everlasting in Hosea 14:8
Hosea 14:8 "Ephraim shall say, What have I to do any more with idols? I have heard [answered] him, and observed [will regard] him: I am like a green fir tree. From me is thy fruit found."
Similarly, God likens his children to cedars of Lebanon and palm trees in Psalms 92:12. Btw, what where the people waving when Christ rode in on the ass? They were waving palm leaves.
Psalms 92:12 "The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: He shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon."
But Satan is represented as a tree as well, in Ezekiel 31 among other places.
Ezekiel 31:8 "The cedars in the garden of God could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs, and the chestnut trees were not like his branches; nor any tree in the garden of God was like unto him in his beauty."Ezekiel 31:9 "I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: so that all the trees of Eden, that were in the garden of God, envied him."
Understand of course that we can not be talking about literal trees here as trees do not think, feel, or envy. Nor was a man king, the Assyrian in verse 3 of this same chapter in the Garden of Eden as there was no nation of Assyria at least named nor was this individual king yet born in a flesh body at the time that Adam and Eve were in the Garden.
But whom did God make perfect in beauty? Of course it was Lucifer/Satan himself.
Ezekiel 28:12 "Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the King of Tyrus, and say unto him, 'Thus saith the Lord God; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty."
Ezekiel 28:13 "Thou hast been in Eden the Garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the Sardis, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created."
Again, was this fleshly King of Tyrus in the Garden of Eden? No, but again Satan was. It isn't hard to understand this and separate that out when you are blessed enough and sharp enough to read and divide the Word with understanding.
So understand then that if Christ was and is the Tree of Life that will still be present in the eternity as we see in Revelation 22:2, the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, that same "tree" that possessed great beauty that was envied would be the opposite of that. If Christ and that Tree of Life offers spiritual and eternal life than the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil that would cause one to die according to God Himself would be Satan. Christ is life, Satan is death to put it hopefully simply enough. No need to get carried away with the labels. But at the same time, the labels work.
The serpent was not some magic talking snake either. First of all, that again is fairy tale stuff. Second, while it is possible for God to open up the voice of a donkey, the serpent He created, the actual snake, has no vocal organs whatsoever. It can just make a hissing sound from its tongue striking out at the air around it. So that "old serpent" as again mentioned in Revelation 12:9 and 20:2 was a role and description for Satan. Nothing more. The tree, again a description of Satan, and nothing more.
So then when Eve says that they were not to touch that tree in Genesis 3:3, what was she saying?
It is sort of buried a bit in the Hebrew but it is there. It is Hebrew word 5060, naga.
A primitive root; properly, to touch, i.e. Lay the hand upon (for any purpose; euphem., to lie with a woman); by implication, to reach (figuratively, to arrive, acquire); violently, to strike (punish, defeat, destroy, etc.) -- beat, (X be able to) bring (down), cast, come (nigh), draw near (nigh), get up, happen, join, near, plague, reach (up), smite, strike, touch.
Now, we know that no apple tree is mentioned. We know that no eating of apples are mentioned. What is mentioned after this encounter by God is the woman's (Eve's) conception and the woman's seed which shall crush the serpent's seed and the serpent's seed that shall bruise the heel of the woman's seed. Understand, today it's controversial. But before man decided to change it to apple trees, it was actually what was taught and known by the Hebrew children and Christians for hundreds and thousands of years. That same seed of the woman is the one who told certain ones that they were of their father the devil in the 8th chapter of John and taught the parable of the tares of the field sown by the wicked one as well. It's what Christ taught and it's whom He even again identified- the serpent seed. So, should we go by Christ's teachings or should we talk about apple trees because it's less embarrassing to the flesh?
Now that is a huge digression from the main point of all of this but I think it's important to test fruits as much as one can as well as statements and teachings by matching them up to God's Word. This "stellar prophet" says Eve was raped. Which I don't get rape at all. Eve was actually the one who brought up the "naga" according to the Word. Eve was the one who saw that the tree was desirable as Satan was created perfect in beauty, and Eve consented to that act that took place. It seems of course that even Adam took part in some way as well. So, rape, no that didn't happen. And as far as "Jews" being the serpent seed, it would depend on whom you want to call a Jew and what they want to call themselves. Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9 both make this distinction and cover this point quite well. Better than any man can, including me.
But that said, no man, no teacher, or one calling himself or herself a "prophet"- something to be at least somewhat wary of, is perfect. Not in the flesh by any means. That is just a reminder and a warning to not just go along with every bit of doctrine that comes along. Some who read this may not agree with what I have written here regarding trees and serpent seed. So be it. But go by the Word of God first.
Now, this vaccine is without a doubt bad news. I don't know if it was a Freudian slip by Boris Johnson to say that the virus must be kept at -70 degrees. I could certainly see it being that and if a doctor or scientist says that is the temperature or in the range at which a virus would be stored to keep preserved, I would say at least some ears should perk up. I do know that even though it sounded like something from The Onion or Babylon Bee, both of which are satire btw, it was a real story that they are collecting volunteers in the UK to get vaccinated and then get infected supposedly with Covid-19. This is dangerously unethical and quite frankly I would think illegal, even on a "volunteer" basis. In this country we tried to deliberately infect or transmit Spanish flu to people about 100 years ago and now there are laws against such a thing. So how they would get away with this in the UK I don't know. But I do know that we're dealing with a rushed, experimental vaccine that people in the know are saying will alter our DNA, attach permanently to the genome, and lead to other effects that we don't know because we don't know. No vaccine like this has ever been made or offered or used before and while it is required to be tested on animals first, and think what you will of that, this has not been tested on animals. The lab rats and guinea pigs are not rats and guinea pigs, but are flesh and blood human beings. If you think that's wise and that it's perfectly safe to line up for your vaccine for a virus that has a greater than 99% survival rate, I would urge you to think again. Whether it's a virus in there or not, and it could well be, there are many, many, many better and safer options to protecting one's self than this particular jab. Again, research it, but not just what Moderna, Pfizer, hospital administrators, and politicians or media types want to say. Listen to and research what the people they don't want you to listen to have to say. It's your health, it's your life, and at least for now, it's still your decision. I certainly hope and pray that all of you make the right one and I can guarantee you it is not this vaccine. You can read the link below.