The Scamdemic Should Be Unraveling at This Point

Yes, I just went there in terms of calling Covid-19, SARS-CoV2, the delta variant, and whatever else they hit us with along the way as a scamdemic. Those who know me either through this blog, Facebook, real life, or any of the three probably realize this is not a new position for me. Now, to be clear and before anyone who stumbles upon this kind of thing for the first time and proclaims me a nut job, I am not claiming no one has gotten sick or died of some virus or collection of viruses. They very much have.

But there comes a time and I would argue in this particular time especially in which it truly is our duty to examine and research many of the things that we are told and that are presented to us as being "true." You see, truth, and this term we have today of "fake news", or just more commonly, lies or fiction, are very unique things. If something is actually true it will stand up to all forms of scrutiny and it will stand basically unmoved and unbothered. How many attacks and critics have their been of God's Word for instance for as long as it's been around? And yet obviously while not everyone is a believer, the Bible is the best selling and most widely distributed book of all time and has had and has obviously a profound effect on many people all around the world. Not to mention that throughout history, when someone has doubted or disputed a historical claim it made, the Bible time and time again has stood up to those doubters and proved them wrong. Truth stands the test of time.

But now what we have is we have these "independent fact checkers" on social media trying to root out and remove "fake news". I put the independent fact checkers in quotes of course because they are not remotely independent, as they are at least partially funded by a company that holds nearly $2 billion of stock in a vaccine company and is run by a former CDC director. If this is so, obviously there is a huge conflict of interest there.

But really the very nature that we need gatekeepers and overseers universally to tell us what is true and declare what is false is ridiculous and insulting. Whereas truth stands unmovable, a lie at some point is almost always and inevitably exposed through normal and natural means. The process of learning for one's self that a source is untrustworthy is extremely valuable and teaches us not to be fooled or taken advantage of by such things in the future. The process of removing, covering up, and putting disclaimers on alternate opinions is weak willed, cowardly, and arrogant tyranny.

Let me say that the main thing and the main source I am about to share with you, the original source is actually not one that is extremely trustworthy. I have a personal belief that the "Health Ranger" Mike Adams, primarily of Natural News, is controlled opposition in some way. However, I have seen the basic information he is sharing more than once and from more than one source. The odd thing here is that when Covid-19 hit the news one of the leading "alternative" sites and individuals pushing for medical martial law even was Mike Adams of Natural News. So whether he truly has had a change of heart of whether he is pursuing some new angle for his own benefit I don't know. But again, the article brings up some good points and I'll share it here as well as highlight some below.

The idea and the claim or belief that there was never an isolate of the virus is not a new one. If you look at and review some references online, you'll see it's been put out there by some of the names Mike Adams references and apparently publicly apologized to, among others. Every so often I would see a claim that it was isolated. But if that was indeed the case, how did they lose it or what did they do with with seeing as how they had no isolate to use for the PCR tests? From the article, and this apparently coming literally from official FDA documents, they have come out and said they literally had on SARS-CoV2 isolate to use.

Point #2: If you have no isolated, certified reference materials, you can’t develop a legitimate analysis test. And this is exactly what the FDA admits in its own documents, which state that since covid-19 viruses weren’t available for the development of the PCR test, they “simulated” it by using human cells and gene bank coronavirus fragments. From the FDA’s own document:

Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA … spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (V